The topic is on trans, crossdressing, and men. I want to indicate the subject of this blog is an autistic individual that has symptoms of learning challenges, anxiety, depression, ruminating thoughts. Sexuality and ASD (whether it’s legacy or post DSM-IV) is very complex but correlate but I believe it’s not a causation. This matter is mature in nature.
This will be indefinitely on a future episode of The Purple Pill. This post posted by someone on X formerly known as Twitter has a lot to say about men being in “women’s spaces” whatever the hell that means… This was “reposted” by Sydney Watson, a right wing “doctor”.
there’s a lot to take apart in this long winded post this person must pay to use on this platform.
Throughout the post, I will be quoting parts of this X-post, because I suspect this is overblown because there is no statistics, data or academic studies, other than attacking acdemia later
For anyone who doesn’t know, I’m a law enforcement officer with experience investigating both homicides and sex crimes. When I was a rookie in 2007, there was a clear understanding that crossdressing men in women’s spaces were often there for sexual reasons, and that if we were called to deal with one, he was to be trespassed from the premises if the manager requested it (meaning criminal charges would be filed if he returned), and any women who were in the bathroom with him would be questioned to make sure they hadn’t been harassed or assaulted.
Thanks for letting me know you’re a biased government employee. There is no location on Diana’s X to get a feel of the locale. The first series of questions is, how young are these people? Is the age of the people could be considered to be a prank? What is “sexual reasons”? And what defines a man to be prohibited in “women’s spaces”?
After that, assuming no one had been assaulted and wanted to press charges, he would be released with a verbal warning to stay out of women’s bathrooms.
What are these “women’s spaces” that would have bathrooms? Seriously I am thinking retail but this is vague.
When I started working sex crimes in 2015, it was still understood that crossdressers did it for sexual reasons, and common knowledge that transvestitic fetishism is often found in men who display other predatory sexual behaviors.
This gets really graphic, that I’ll leave it on the X side (no pun intended), Do I need to put up Natalie/ContraPoints’ take that is the most watched video ever on any social media platform that I posted over 30,000 views in less than year? Of course nothing original gets that many views. But part I cut out had lots important things that LEOs with biases refuse to understand.
By the time I made Homicide in 2017, you could hear the first rumblings of the impending eruption of narcissism and delusion, if you were paying close attention. I wasn’t, but you know what they say about hindsight being 20/20
I suppose she thinks she’s Doctor Ramani…
There was a very obvious reluctance to go beyond recounting the bones of this part of these particular cases, and very little discussion of the part [transvestite fetishism] played in the motive or the psychology of the killers, a reluctance that was especially obvious when discussing crimes with a clear sexual aspect. Certainly no instructor ever tried to draw a link between a suspect’s TF and elements of the crime.
In short trans people kill! Great logic!
In my first abnormal sexual psych class, it was worse. Any time the subject came up, the professor would say something like “this is what we used to think, but recent studies have proven that [trans women] are no threat to other women and that [transvestite fetishism] doesn’t exist/affects natal women also.” (He went back and forth on that one).
While I do not encourage anyone to do anything illegal, society is not black and white, there is this obsession on the-right on “groomers”, “pedos”, etc. but yet they never seem to understand it’s more than simple socially inappropriate acts. “Groomers” is now been weaponized and any actual, emotional abuse (think the Sarah Lawrence College survivors) that alone had “grooming” and “emotional abuse” but of course in LEO’s world, it has to be sexual contact, and other perverted things to consider that to be a crime.
So whose the bigger creep?
On a more local level, gender seperation has been the bedrock of the Granite State, and the news in the last week of the Governor vetoing certain what I suspect is niche issues, overall the state is not as gender-phobic when third-places where very hard lined, to women or men. if social media is focused on antidotes (this X post has second part) then what is the motive for someone to appear to be a different gender, especially if trans people are apparently self-centered criminals?
What if conservative cultures that force men to be a certain stereotype and women to be a certain stereotype, does that mean you are causing a gender war against each other? When I have read The Union Leader or watched news on WMUR, these repeated domestic violent crimes, could’ve been the extreme, solid world of boundaries and full blown tall gates to keep certain people they don’t like out? So how are they supposed to fit in?
This X-user to me is just a random person like me with no known credentials to trust their claims, but it’s the thousands and if not millions of individuals that are nobodies making critical decisions to punish people that don’t look like them!
Not every situation is sexual, not every person that goes to men’s bible studies wants to hook up with a woman, but perhaps he doesn’t trust his own gender. Is considered infidelity if a single female uses a married man for fixing lawn mowers because the woman doesn’t like men and prefers to be single but use men when it’s a need? What if that’s a right winger?
Infidelity doesn’t have to be sex! This person appears to be the age of Gen X, all about inclusivity and rights for gays, oh and were they bending with gender stereotypes in their twenties? Why does Queen Xer, Tulsi Gabbard (b 1981, at the end of X) sound so much like a man but everyone loves her? but as the trans comes along, oh let’s throw away the 1990s!
I strongly believe that gender norms, and gender conformities and inter and intra gender hatred has caused the rise of “concerns” of trans and groomers and other types of quirks
There is a second X post that requires it’s own here because I can’t begin to tell you that the people who are entitled to “freedom” like to punish people with the opposite on no facts or based claims.
Funny how our policies work.