This sticky subject is really one controversial one. I wonder if there is a theory of mind that people are not open to talking about…

Of course this subject is vey “touchy” – that is self-stimulation in the sexual form. There is so much stigma to it, but for those who have been put into forbidding sexual romance… the way I have approached it was as long as I remember doing it probably the wrong way because I suspect penal damage but at the same time it “felt good”. The such self-stimulation in the sexual sense could be images, hard copy photos, naked or fully clothed or even a freckin imagination or reliving a moment where I wished it was sexual. While I could be objectifying or fetishizing a lady, I imagine the sexual experience amongst that female, empathizing her emotions of such figurative bond, how she is feeling physically and sexually. For someone whose highly imaginative, you may flip between the naked to the non naked to get a sense.

You’re more turned on by the genitilia than the boobs because that it’s so “expected” and then your views of her genitals down-there is “the gateway to deepest form of love” as sexual intercourse once was considered to be the most “deepest” and the kissing was the most superficial. Years later you realize you never liked talking about navels of any gender was “icky” because years later you find out years late the navel is tied to her vaginal nerves. Then you realize the connection, then validating you like both because both can resemble the same thing then it makes you even more stimulated than you need to be.

Your deepest core is to. be attracted to your loved on in the most physical and treat her in the most caring way. But you live in 2025 there is a No-Fap movement, and stigmatizing this plus. the legitimization of returning to treating women as things, through objectification, leaving you to wonder what is the norm?