The New Hampshire Democratic Party, as bad as living in a deep red state own does not speak for me. In state & local politics, as early as my twenties, neither party addressed my concerns. the Democratic party like the GOP will most likely lead me on of listening but not acting, where in the NHGOP, when the phone don’t ring, you’ll know it’s them.
There is a bunch of problems going forward for the next five to ten years for autistics and the “leadership” thereof about relationships and building friends, etc., etc.
To go into further detail of that statement; we face problems such as trying to fit every possible individual into one unified group instead of unifying 1 and 88 people with autistic or pervasive developmental disorders; secondly the research and assessment (or diagnoses) often compares us to the normal functioning peer groups; which is also an unfair and inaccurate portrayal to the autistic community.
There are a bunch of people who go around the world to speak about autism, to lecture about the subject or even speak badly (even with it being unintentional.) This problem is also a multi pronged issue too. One is the lack of editorial judgement when delivering these messages to the public; secondly the medium is the message; especially in the world of the Web and social media; and how the people take these messages. I’ve said in the past that for a long time people in the Millenial generation (born from 1977 to 2001) were the most intolerant generation of people with developmental disabilities; however that number is slowly going down – but not a lot. The problem here, is those numbers are becoming tolerant because of a career path they have chosen, not really because they want to be tolerant from the heart.
And the last point is what becomes the most dangerous part for ANYONE with autism; the message, or the medium may mislead these future professionals of the special needs industry; there is still some mixed messages that all autistics are mute and dumb, and often they are lost little bastards; and often its boys; because its only boys who are bad; and its only boys who are into science and math; and again guys are socially retarded; and that all autistics shall not have a life like everyone else because of their alleged social dysfunction; and they really should be friends with their neurological peers; and shall not even have the chance of getting married and having offspring that might reproduce another autistic.
The entire boldface was the subliminal or innuendo messaging of what is taught in college, or in professional development (bitter people training.) There is a lot of psychobabble about “social pyramid”, “social capital”, “social this” or “social that”. And many of this BULLSHIT has anything to do with social skills!
So in closing, the state of affairs for autism and relationships are bleak and will have a dark future. Not because “progressives” want to make a movement for change and acceptance; its really for people who want to be career mothers or career slanderers to make blaintely false and misleading statements that all autistics are bad, all autistics should be sent to Laconia or a state that still has a state school for developmentally disabled people. And yet we have to settle with the fact of “they are being honest” and “they are telling the God honest truth” but yet if I make a “God honest truth” I’d be charged for hate speech even if there isn’t a hate speech law in my state.
The only option is to settle with the “facts” with the hopes these people will die to hell sooner rather than later.
My birthday is near and in the coming weeks I will be 26 years of age. It will be the 5 year mark where I had turned 21 and finished school on the same day. It is very scary to think how in half a decade how I have fallen apart and came to a hard realization about how I have to accept my differences, and accept my future outlooks in life. (I think you know its really about “relationships”.)
I don’t talk like I used to because I am tired of talking to slight egomaniacs. I am tired of hearing someone’s “honest” or someone pushing an agenda on me. I might be venting a little about my mother, but that’s really besides my point.
I am asking for much this year, nor do I really give a shit about it ether. As I wrote in last October, about my struggles of people remembering my birthday; I’ve just accepted the fact “its just another day”. That happened last year, I went on a trip to the mountains after doing some shopping at the state’s surplus agency getting networking gear. I brushed off the the 25th anniversary of my existence.
I am not happy about the big two-six. And this isn’t just the normal PDD obsession leading to one’s bday. It’s actually worse.
I realize I won’t be happy. Its not because I choose not to, its because I am forced to not be happy. The leadership on the ASD self-interest has effectively slandered my group, and has effectively committed uncriminal behavior like psychological ID theft. These goddamned sons of bitches have forced me to grow up faster than my peers (since it is “normal” to still act like an adolescent at 35 years old, if you don’t have a disability) and yet these same sons – of – bitches treat people like me as crap when they aren’t “on the clock”. These people insist we work for some corporation and be highly accountable at all times.
These freckin bastards also believe we should only fall in love in our own peer group. I’m talking about the PDD group. As you already know (I assume) the numbers of PDD male to female ratio is about 4 out of 5 male to female. I probably would say 3 out of 5 are females, since I see more of them in the adult services than I have seen in the special education. But still, I am put at a disadvantage.
My only wishes for my birthday is:
I’ve realized I have done some bitching, but many punks in my life have no idea what they have done to me, and how its ok to not be accountable of their actions, their words and their actions. It is men with a certain social standard who have wrongfully been abused and used!
I do not hate women! And I mean that. I respect them! They are very caring people, and they have great talents! Younger ladies is rare, thirtysomethings you have better luck I only have a problem when they go on a political or systemic tirade against one social class for no realistic reason in the general population, and get away with it. Sadly, many are near or post menopausal and they generically look ugly, because they act as if they are fat and ugly. I hate to be so biased, but since ASD and PDD individuals are mostly male, I feel so personally offended to be an adult male because we have to treat women as God.
I only ask to be somewhat happy for my Birthday. But apparently in America that is asking for too much according to all the experts I have to comply since America is now a “1984” society.
P.S. there is one other thing I would want for my birthday. To have more traffic on this blog and more discussions from my readers, because if it weren’t for you (if you even read my blogs) this blog wouldn’t exist.
End of my political/personal rant.
I have strong (and rightful) hatred to women of a certain age and their day job working as public employees at ether the local school district and/or educational collaborative that operate as a public sector op.
I’ve learned from these people. Well, they are teachers, they are public servants, so I am under the impression I am supposed to lead by example. Women tend to be skeptical. They tend to not trust people (no wonder why I am so fucked up) including the boys in the SPED classroom. They are paranoid. They worry too much. And lastly THEY TEND TO BE PRIVATE! (which really pisses me off about people with tits and cunts.)
As I grew up in the public institutions, I couldn’t stand the overzealous policies on “confidentiality”, “privacy.” I never forget the times where a teacher and another “paraprofessional” would talk near us then say “want to go into that room” then go and close the door and then talk with the blinds wide open. I never was paranoid about teachers talking about me. Well, maybe I lied, at a certain point in my life. Its like the Chicago way of doing business. Lets close the door then talk about things that shouldn’t be talked behind closed doors. Its the underlying factor how these people start to potentially violate public records laws, or to try to play the Privacy Rules of FERPA and HIPPA over the Public’s Right to Know Laws.
These liberal union cunts also thought we were so stupid that if a kid would go crazy in another classroom on the other side of the campus and get CPI restraints, that we didn’t know what was really going on thanks to the Corruption-Enabling (overzealous privacy enabling) Hacks in our schools!
And I wonder why I can’t talk to strangers! Because I was subliminally taught to have behind closed doors conversations with people in private!
I have no respect for women. They corrupt government, and they corrupt society and fuck up the most vulnerable people in society by overprotecting us! I sometimes wonder why in the fuck god created Eve. I suppose god is a filthy old jerk.
I was on a walk recently, and I saw a car drive by. It had on its license plate GATSBY – probably as in The Great Gatsby, a common read for many twentysomething punks. Beneath the car, had an Obama bumper sticker, giving away that this person is a rich Moonbat (or is a rich yuppie wannabee.)
I never read The Great Gatsby, and I think I am not missing anything. The book allegedly takes place in some yuppie area of Long Island turing the Roaring Twenties. I’ve read bits and pieces of other summaries, that the book essentially describes rich people who think from what I interrupted pretty liberal. And rich too. And the book also describes the Prohibition Era – again goes back to the alcohol thing
What I have a problem is, people who think they are rich, that money buys them happiness, drink and party like its no ones business, and think voting Democrat is going to solve the world problems. I don’t like how people don’t feel the world around them, but they’ll care for someone in a third world country, and they piss money like its no ones business, and then induce themselves with so much alchies they just loose sight about the rest of the world.
I grew up in a town where there were rich anti socially drunk alcoholics, and alcohol really bothers me, I do drink – but once or twice a year. I never liked beer, and I have family members who have drinking issues. I just don’t like these classes of people. And I do know that this book was very popular on peoples Facebook account, back when the “network” system was in use. I believe it was number 1 in my regional network, so I am not insane and retarded to say that this book has had some impact in society.
I found some videos on YouTube that should make you really sick to your stomach. I don’t think I need to explain much details (unless I should say some in case I have visually impaired viewers.)
This first video is the infamous documentary produced by Autism Speaks entitled Autism Every Day on WrongPlanet and they had actually beaten the crap out of this when it first circulated. Unfortunately, they caved in to receiving funding from Autism Speaks and now they have a tainted reputation, again that Asperger Syndrome is still not officially connected to autism.
The video starts with such deepening and deathly like music. The entire video focused on the negative, even near the end, when they basically faked their way of turning the negative into a positive experience. These Manhattanite women (you could even consider a few of these characters as Sex and the City-esque mothers – by telling their demeanor) because you know the rich are just like us – rigght – just ask the head of the New York Stock Exchange as I reported in April acting as the boy next door type. One of the mothers was frustrated since she can’t go out to have a coffee date with one of her girlfriends because her daughter is taking up much of her life.
The worst offender was when the mother halfway through the video said that she was contemplating suicide by driving off the G.W.B. with her autistic daughter. (The context is still in question since maybe she was referring to her struggles finding a kindergarten program for her, might had been a run off rant so to speak.) As she was saying such heavy statement, her daughter was walking in the room right as she said such strong statement.
These women have no idea that at least in New York State, they have “area agency” systems, and in other states they might even have a state agency for disabled people. In this entire video, no mention at all of any public or public/private programs as I had just mentioned, only the frustrations with the insurance companies and the debt they had entailed finding sources of revenue to make their kids somewhat happy.
So in that video, they had effectively made autism a third person, a Commander Data like humanoid and they can’t talk so therefore they are dumb.
The next YouTube video, makes you want to think twice about those A Walk for Autism that you get spammed by your ignorant liberal friends. The video shows how much the receive in these bake sale type of fundraisers, and how they just spend it on themselves! From the lavish digs on 7th Avenue, to the obscene salaries of this alleged non-profit entity, the chief officers and VPs making about nearly a half of a million dollars! Not to mention the excessive expenditures for advertising, facilities, and fixtures. The end of the clip states this statement: “Still feel like walking? Grab your dog and go to the park. It’s much more productive”
If you want to attempt to ether confront to Autism Speaks directly or even reply to your liberal friends’ spam invitation, don’t try to even tell them that Autism Speaks is a fraud! They won’t listen to you. They’ll treat you as if you are mute and dumb since that is Autism Speaks’ goal – to only let grown ups who don’t have autism (since they are afterall child-like – to them) and silence anyone who disagrees with them.
Geez, and I liked Bob Wright, who made a crippled business of one of the Big 3 network into a strong one before it got ruined by other GE mismanagers. But the Wrights does posses mismanagement skills. By running an alleged non-profit as a profit seeking entity and misleading the public.
If it was legal for me to punch people that have that blue puzzle pin, I would. Because they are arrogant and ignorant jerks.
*
Living with autism and dealing with its own baggage is a problem in itself. Living with autism (and being diagnosed and told unwillingly) and coming from a low middle class family in a community of upper middle class that not only looks down at lower income people, but they also look down at the disabled people also. You’d think if you buy the bullshit from the C.D.C. with the current autism statistics that you’d think there would be some decency of the population to accept and engage with autistic people. Oh, wait the Millenials (returing from yesterdays rant) accepts (ill)legal ailens, and homosexuals, and other liberal groups – but when it comes to an American that is suffering with autism – fuggedaboutit.
Sticking to the topic: if you thought the Medicaid/Medicare outsourcing and other health and human services in its entirety were cut was bad- think again. This following story will make you want to throw your crappy Linux boxes to our elected hack politicians houses.
I came across a damning law that that some colleague in the IT services industry had brought this up to me. Thanks to our jackass beancounters that are mostly NH-styled Republicans (please use a search engine because its MUCH different than the National party’s definition), they proposed a law during our budget session last winter. The Governor signed it into law last month. In the text of the law it says the following.
I. The general court finds that:
(a) The cost of obtaining software for the state’s computer systems has become a significant expense to the state;
(b) The personnel costs of maintaining the software on the state’s computers has also become a significant expense to the state;
Is this a joke? I am no friend of Microsoft and Apple is no angel, but why in the fuck is our state insisting to go into the CHEAP route? What about that lameass Ci$co solution the IT agency demanded across the entire NH State government with Video, IP Telephony and unreliable computer networking services that Cisco is known to be, however they did go forward with a huge RFP during that same time. How could they get away of doing with that? Cisco don’t use lot of “open source” software (and dare I say open-standards) and do you think our state would be better off using such amateur phone systems like the Asterisk – which is such a resource hog that would waste of tax paying dollars in other ways! Why did the General Court, their finance committee or the Executive Council stop that Request for Proposal at that same time?
Microsoft has some solutions that can’t be replicated, IBM/Lotus has some solutions that can’t be replicated and others have solutions that can’t be replicated. Why? Because most Open Source Solutions are done by fat ass virgins that go to Occupy Wall Street, that whine and bitch about how greedy Microsoft and say their software sucks but YET they NEVER used the software firsthand to begin with! They never had a real job in the private sector and they don’t know how a real office works, if they do its just the “idea” of it. They don’t give a shit about how to make an OSS version of SharePoint, because they don’t care. The way they email with Mozilla’s Thunderbird is fine even when it can’t do read receipts, no flagging importance of emails, cannot edit and resend messages and can’t multi message exports or hell even Rich Text message composing before it bitches at you asking (or saying how liberal geeky virgins hate anything that looks pretty or anything thats GUI FWIW) some email clients can’t open HTML messages, do you want to send it text only or both?
I think this would be a policy coming from the Institution in Durham for their internal IT systems, because UNH loves technical diversity. They have an international known division called the Interoperability Lab (IOL) I don’t know if one of those Solons that sponsored this law came from UNH and knew about the IOL. Alls I know as a state citizen is they do interoperability tests and do an annual hackathon-like interoperable networks. Regardless– part of this movement of “Cut, cut, cut” is obviously is coming from in part of the 70 year old Solons that think technology in this modern society is way too much money. I agree with them in the sense of them pissing dollars like Ci$co equipment, but others I am outraged by this law.Some of our politicians of certain beliefs think our state should be living in 1776. Our constitution had built in protection such as society would evolve and modernize, but of course the government still doesn’t have the right to tell private citizens what to do.
Again this law only applies to the New Hampshire State agencies of a headcount of 12,000 plus people mostly coming from the conservative city of Concord.This law is attempting for our Solons to essentially kill our small government to begin with compared to the neighboring states! I don’t think that is a PC thing to say! Yes, I think there are some lard-sized agencies (like UNH for an example) but for the love of gawd – this is a lame law.
If recent history is proven right, Massachusetts attempted to do this, with their Hack CIO attempting to push the large government of well over 100,000 layabout employees to use OpenOffice and after the failures of incompatibility, the pulled the plug on the attempt. (And that CIO was IIRC a Romney appointment – I could be wrong – it was in 2005 when they attempted to do such thing.)
Now I am starting to get sick of the perverted politics coming from all sides. Don’t forget that the bureaucrats up in Concord, are in fact – very conservative – I’d bet 80% of them (except for the ones that work for DHHS, DOE and other like agencies that look out for ASD directly) are the ones to really be suspicious of. So in every other agency and up in the State House – they don’t like the ideal of liberalism in the sense of welcoming all groups on their property. I remember the security officer a few years ago of a hack State Trooper was scared of me taking pictures of decommissioned computer terminals in the halls of the State House. He probably thought I was a creepy jewish spy or something like that. Oh and I had to deal with a hack because I had inadvertently dialed 9-1-1 for some unknown reason because all calls are state handled a few years ago- <sarcasm>that was a lot of fun dealing with a cold hearted bureaucrat from Merrimack County that probably never knew about autism.<\sarcasm>
So this anger I have isn’t against a popular party of our state – its everyone involved in our horrible leadership. This law is just plain absurd. If I was a politician of our General Court, I’d create a Vendor Avoidance List or VAL(in one of my fictional governments in my Lego world, this was done.) It be a black list for the government to not do business with vendors that are deemed bad for the government’s plants property or its own employees. I’d make such policy or law to prohibit the State to buy the shit from San Jose from that Chamber$ douche.
The text of the law it in its entirely due to protection of public domain copyright laws
AN ACT relative to the use of open source software and open data formats by state agencies and relative to the adoption of a statewide information policy regarding open government data standards.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
5:1 Statement of Purpose and Findings.
I. The general court finds that:
(a) The cost of obtaining software for the state’s computer systems has become a significant expense to the state;
(b) The personnel costs of maintaining the software on the state’s computers has also become a significant expense to the state;
(c) It is necessary for the functioning of the state that computer data owned by the state be permanently available to the state throughout its useful life;
(d) To guarantee the succession and permanence of public data, it is necessary that the state’s accessibility to that data be independent of the goodwill of the state’s computer system suppliers and the conditions imposed by these suppliers;
(e) It is in the public interest to ensure interoperability of computer systems through the use of software and products that promote open, platform-neutral standards;
(f) It is also in the public interest that the state be free, to the greatest extent possible, of conditions imposed by parties outside the state’s control on how, and for how long, the state may use the software it has acquired; and
(g) It is not in the public interest and it is a violation of the fundamental right to privacy for the state to use software that, in addition to its stated function, also transmits data to, or allows control and modification of its systems by, parties outside of the state’s control.
II. The general court further finds that:
(a) The acquisition and widespread deployment of open source software can significantly reduce the state’s costs of obtaining and maintaining software;
(b) Open source software guarantees that its encoding of data is not tied to a single provider;
(c) Open source software enables interoperability through adherence to open, platform-neutral standards;
(d) Open source software contains no restrictions on how, or for how long, it may be used; and
(e) Since open source software fully discloses its internal operations, it can be audited, at any time and by anyone of the state’s choosing, for internal functions that are contrary to the public’s interests and rights.
III. Therefore, it is in the public interest that the state of New Hampshire consider using open source software in its public computing functions.
5:2 New Subdivision; Department of Information Technology; Open Standards. Amend RSA 21-R by inserting after section 9 the following new subdivision:21-R:10 Definitions. In this subdivision:
I. “Open source software” means software that guarantees the user:
(a) Unrestricted use of the software for any purpose;
(b) Unrestricted access to the respective source code;
(c) Exhaustive inspection of the working mechanisms of the software;
(d) Use of the internal mechanisms and arbitrary portions of the software, to adapt them to the needs of the user;
(e) Freedom to make and distribute copies of the software; and
(f) Modification of the software and freedom to distribute modifications of the new resulting software, under the same license as the original software.
II. “Open standards” means specifications for the encoding and transfer of computer data that:
(a) Is free for all to implement and use in perpetuity, with no royalty or fee;
(b) Has no restrictions on the use of data stored in the format;
(c) Has no restrictions on the creation of software that stores, transmits, receives, or accesses data codified in such way;
(d) Has a specification available for all to read, in a human-readable format, written in commonly accepted technical language;
(e) Is documented, so that anyone can write software that can read and interpret the complete semantics of any data file stored in the data format;
(f) If it allows extensions, ensures that all extensions of the data format used by the state are themselves documented and have the other characteristics of an open data format;
(g) Allows any file written in that format to be identified as adhering or not adhering to the format; and
(h) If it includes any use of encryption or other means of data obfuscation, provides that the encryption or obfuscation algorithms are usable in a royalty-free, nondiscriminatory manner in perpetuity, and are documented so that anyone in possession of the appropriate encryption key or keys or other data necessary to recover the original data is able to write software to access the data.
III. “Proprietary software” means software that does not fulfill all of the guarantees provided by open source software.
IV. “State agency” means any department, commission, board, institution, bureau, office, or other entity, by whatever name called, including the legislative branch of state government, established in the state constitution, statutes, or executive orders. The judicial branch of state government is explicitly exempted from this definition.
21-R:11 Use of Open Source Software by State Agencies.
I. For all software acquisitions, each state agency, in consultation with the department of information technology, shall:
(a) Consider whether proprietary or open source software offers the most cost effective software solution for the agency, based on consideration of all associated acquisition, support, maintenance, and training costs;
(b) Except as provided in subparagraphs (d) and (e), acquire software products primarily on a value-for-money basis, based on consideration of the cost factors as described in subparagraph (a);
(c) Provide a brief analysis of the purchase decision, including consideration of the cost factors in subparagraph (a), to the chief information officer;
(d) Avoid the acquisition of products that do not comply with open standards for interoperability or data storage; and
(e) Avoid the acquisition of products that are known to make unauthorized transfers of information to, or permit unauthorized control of or modification of a state agency’s computer.
II. All state procurement documents related to software acquisitions shall include language that requires adherence to this section.
21-R:12 Metrics; Inventory of Open Source Software Used by State Agencies. Each state agency shall maintain an inventory of all proprietary and open source software products used by the agency.
21-R:13 Use of Open Data Formats by State Agencies.
I. The commissioner shall assist state agencies in the purchase or creation of data processing devices or systems that comply with open standards for the accessing, storing, or transferring of data. The commissioner shall:
(a) Ensure that any new data standards which the state of New Hampshire defines and to which it owns all rights are open standards compliant.
(b) Use open standards unless specific project requirements preclude use of an open data format.
(c) Reexamine existing data stored in a restricted format to which the state of New Hampshire does not own the rights every 4 years to determine if the format has become open and, if not, whether an appropriate open standard exists.
(d) Make readily accessible, on the state website, documentation on open data formats used by the state of New Hampshire. When data in open format is made available through the state’s website, a link shall be provided to the corresponding data format documentation.
21-R:14 Statewide Information Policy on Open Government Data Standards.
I. The commissioner shall develop a statewide information policy based on the following principles of open government data. According to these principles, open data is data that is:
(a) Complete. All public data is made available, unless subject to valid privacy, security, or privilege limitations.
(b) Primary. Data is collected at the source, with the highest possible level of granularity, rather than in aggregate or modified forms.
(c) Timely. Data is made available as quickly as necessary to preserve the value of the data.
(d) Accessible. Data is available to the widest range of users for the widest range of purposes.
(e) Machine processable. Data is reasonably structured to allow automated processing.
(f) Nondiscriminatory. Data is available to anyone, with no requirement of registration.
(g) Nonproprietary. Data is available in a format over which no entity has exclusive control, with the exception of national or international published standards.
(h) License-free. Data is not subject to any copyright, patent, trademark, or trade secret regulation. Reasonable privacy, security, and privilege restrictions may be allowed.
II. The information policy developed under paragraph I shall include a mechanism for adoption and review by each state agency. Each agency that adopts the policy shall designate a contact person responsible for oversight and implementation of open government data standards for that agency. The contact shall act as a liaison between the department, the implementing agency, and the public in matters related to open government data standards. The commissioner shall include the status of the development and implementation of the statewide information policy based on open government data standards in the quarterly report to the legislative oversight committee under RSA 21-R:9.
III. In developing the open data standards policy, the commissioner shall solicit information from the secretary of state relative to state archiving practices and the collection of data for historical purposes.
5:3 Department of Information Technology; Duties of Commissioner Regarding Acquisition of Information Systems. Amend RSA 21-R:4, I to read as follows:
I. Providing technical information technology consultation to all executive branch agencies and to any other agency that requests it, including technical adviceconsistent with the principles of open government data established in RSA 21-R:11 through RSA 21-R:14 during the development or acquisition of information systems.
5:4 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Approved: March 12, 2012
Effective Date: May 11, 2012″
From: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2012/HB0418.html
A few days ago, the State of Illinois approved pension reform to the state’s public sector employees. However the distraction to the story by a attention grabbing conservative in the state’s legislature. The man, Illinois State Representative, Mike Bost (R) droped an f-bomb, threw papers and YELLED to the top of his lungs and made a big immature scene with no one doing CPI holds (restraints) or any security officer taking him out or taking him to the “time out room” or anything that a 6 year old PDD student in a school would get disciplined for with a similar behavior.
Now why in the hell did no one call the campus security and not pulling the man out, whom of which couldn’t keep a calm, cool and collective approach in their state house? Why didn’t the Illinois State Police not press charges against him? The politician I think from seeing the grainy picture might had been wearing some little girls bra underneath. (just kidding.) Though acting like children or acting out like a PDD student in an out of district school program in a public arena is wrong. Especially as public leaders.
Now I am for any pension reform, but its unfortunate that most republican leaders have to act like desperate little girls and use emotion and act violent as you see in the video link to push politics. This is the same ideal of excessive emotions that the liberal moonbat mothers did in Concord a month ago so.
If I were his colleagues, I would spank his rear end in public for acting like a 6 year old PDD kid for that immature behavior. I wouldn’t get away doing that (especially in closed-minded state where I live in.) I only applaud for his reform, but his delivery FAILED. We shouldn’t applaud his immature, girly behavior.
Note: I used “Gay” in quotes on the title, in the sense that some “conservatives” are acting like transsexual women like the emotions. John Boehner was the prime example last year where he couldn’t stop crying in public.
Or hell call it “NT”?
I know its a registered trademark of Nortel (Previously known as Northern Telecom), but Nortel has gone bankrupt and many of their businesses have gone on wholesale, so I don’t know what actual company might own the trademark. In fact its alleged that might had been the reason why Microsoft didn’t use the NT branding in Windows 2000 (and eliminating totally by Windows XP or NT 5.1) because of a potential lawsuit of Nortel.
I have so much opposition of such techno terminology of the whole hell known as the Autism Spectrum Disorders. For one thing, why in the hell do we need a “label” (for a lack of a better word) to describe the “normal” population. Are we afraid to degrade their potential or are we afraid to degrade the hack psych-o-logists and other “professionals” that had pissed a lot of money into an Ivy League education in the study of psych-o-logy?
This is beyond words like patently absurd. I just can’t get why such groups (mostly in the Asperger world – which is NOT autism) has to make such confusion.
Enough with the acronyms and abbreviations, enough with the technicality of the “labels” enough with having pride with a disorder that is technically unrelated with autism and please for the AS community, dont flaunt your pride that is similar to homosexual population. It’s just plain insulting to the legitimate group who is feeling ASHAMED instead of coming out of the closet as a super high functioning retard.
I have been awake for over two and a half hours, and I was watching the early morning news programs in between watching FNC’s “Red Eye”. I was caught offguard of a news flash about autism. It’s basically a fill in story on what appears to be a slow newsday, I am not surprised, but at least there is traction for a change as we lead into April’s Autism Awareness Month.
I’ll post video later this morning, but here’s a few blurbs from a CBS wire story,
” One out of 88 children in the U.S. has an autism spectrum disorder, according to the latest estimate by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Previously the CDC estimated autism’s prevalence at about an average of 1 in 110 U.S. children. The new estimate suggests autism is more common than previously thought – about 25 percent more common – and may affect more than one million children and teens in the U.S.
“One thing the data tells us with certainty – there are many children and families who need help,” CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden said in a written statement. “We must continue to track autism spectrum disorders because this is the information communities need to guide improvements in services to help children.”
For the CDC’s study, researchers looked at autism prevalence estimates from 14 areas in the country. Since every state is not included, the CDC warned the rate “should not be generalized to the United States as a whole.” But the data do show that autism diagnoses continue to increase. It’s published in the March 29 issue of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Boys are still about five times more likely to be diagnosed with autism in the U.S. than girls, according to the CDC report. It estimated one in 54 boys have autism, while one in 252 girls do. The number of children identified with ASDs ranged from 1 in 210 children in Alabama to 1 in 47 children in Utah. The largest increases were among Hispanic and black children.
Some of this increase may be due to the way children are identified, diagnosed and served in their communities, although exactly how much is due to these factors is unknown, the CDC said.
Study results from the 2008 surveillance year show more than 11 out of 1,000 8-year-old kids have been identified as having an ASD, about a 23 percent increase since the last CDC report in 2009. Some of this increase is due to the way children are identified, diagnosed and served in their communities, although exactly how much is due to these factors is unknown. “
CBSNEWS.com
In the middle of a paragraph, I love how many of the MSM is playing the gender card, by focusing on the higher number in boys. As I have previously reported the MSM loves to focus on that because it’s reversed-sexism by indirectly referring to boys as stupid, etc.