Catfish, part two

If you follow MTV’s Catfish, you know the ins and outs of people fibbing of who they are online. I’ve always found the series so interesting because many online relationships (at least featured on this program) begin on Facebook. (you know the full-name mandated unwritten social rule of the social networking road?)
This show was clearly a surprise. As someone who has a hard time keeping a suprise, I was able to not spoil ANYTHING when my mother and grandmother watched this show On Demand last Thursday. As someone who has autism, its sometimes be hard to fib.
Well, the rest is a spoiler alert if you haven’t watched it.
Last Tuesday’s episode was so interesting. The show featured Lauren, 21 year old Texan who met a guy on MySpace (I had to search what was MySpace!) 8 years ago. They also got engaged. Lauren had moved a lot when she was younger and her mother had passed away when she was 6. Lauren tried to authenticate this guy named Derek, a guy that lives in Maryland to offer him a webcam, in which he had turned down every time.
The two on camera talent  met with Lauren, whom of which had a child a couple years ago at her house and she had touted “in her heart” she “knew” that he “was the right guy”. This line alone  “the fact that I haven’t met him doesn’t matter. I know what I want”  was how she was throughout the entire episode. When the hosts Nev Schulman and Max Joseph went to dig up the information, the “Derek” guy appeared to be legitimate, and the real red flag was the phone number. When they looked up the phone number it was another man, and when they searched that person’s identity it was an middle aged black man. The guys were skeptical, and concerned about Derek
Nev and Max brought this up to Lauren and she still believed in what her heart was telling her. The father and stepmother then came to meet with the three of them, which the father was surprised that there was a crew there, and never even heard of Catfish. They also didn’t know this Derek was someone who she met online and the father had some legitimate concern for his daughter and both parents urged caution if she choose to meet them in person.
When Max and Nev went to call Derek, he got nervous too. He explained needing advance notice, a set schedule, etc. What wasn’t mentioned on the air or even at all, could possibly be very well he was skeptical about Lauren. Maybe she was too good to be true too!  As they went to Maryland and on the ride to his house, she started to get very nervous, and Max and Nev were trying to be realistic as she was getting testy of them as she felt they were trying to minimize the legitimacy of Derek.
Well, it could’ve been one the most surprising moments of the series. As they got to Derek’s house, and Lauren ringing the doorbell, she got more nervous and turned her back against the door.  Derek opened the door and came right behind her. I was surprised to see it was really him. This show was kinda like the Friendzone because they had time to kill and featured a few minutes of them in their first actual date.
Her son Mason, did come with a best friend, and the following day Derek met with Mason. They seemed to get along right out of the bat. And about the phone number? Derek had the number as long as he had it, and doesn’t know why that other individual’s name is on his number.  A live (at least on the first run on the Eastern/Central time zone)  follow up program had both of them on, and they are still together, and taking it one step at time. They hope to get married within a year.  Both Max and Nev stated that they were skeptical and they were surprised to see it was really him.
This was so fun to watch, and there were a couple good tweets
@Bunch1402  “One of the best shows ever for catfish! So happy for Lauren and Dereck. We need more shows like that one!”
but I think this tweet is going to be back to reality
@thatoneguydrew: “This last episode of @CatfishMTV brought tears to my eyes. Seeing this come to pass was worth all the sadness from all the other eps!”
This was a nice distraction from the typical depressing experiences featured on Catfish. Out of 99.99% of the such online relationship, that .1% can be a story like Lauren and Derek. Very rare in a crazy world of online relationships. This needs to be bottled up!

Facebook – “Real People” + Fake Content = No Social Accountability

It is no surprise that Facebook is not good for the overall society and of course its the few bad apples of the “normal” functioning population.
The background of this story was inspired by a recent posts of a blog I follow, Once a Month 4 Ladies, I also opined on this post.
There has been studies dating in the last couple of years that using Facebook and having friends who post over glamorous content that is only a snapshot of ones life.
It is hard to try to distill all the drama from the childish adults on Facebook.
One of my pet peeves is how people have locked down their profile down to only “friends” who can see the content. I am not saying I am a creepy and Level 3 sex offender or a stalker, but if you are keeping things private, then should you even be putting promiscuous photos on the packetwaves called the Internet?
Especially when it’s someone who posts a scandalous default picture, then gets all creeped out from all the attention. Well if you build it, people come! It isn’t my fault that someone upstairs made you beautiful! Its not my fault that your father wasn’t doing his job of teaching you how to control your assets!
The rest of the story comes from some heavy personal opinions of being raised from a not so privileged family, and someone dealing with his disorder, of being younger and more neiave than his peers. I started to see the ins and outs of the social privileged world when I was just 21 or so. And coming to such realization really disturbed me, but it was always like that, and in every society there is privileged class.
What has driven me nuts is how people who use Facebook are required to use their “real name”. Facebook has said for a long time that society’s social norms believe if you use your real full name in the real world that it should extend to the virtual world.
Let me tell you some secrets, since I live near the county where Facebook was created. There are some certain locales where people’s egos go above their “full name”. In certain affluent areas like Hahhhvahhhd Yahhdd, or Westchester County, NY, people have certain levels of social class or status. And in these certain privileged social circles, referring to someone like Mark Zuckerberg for an example is proper social protocol to refer him by his full name, because it is the uppity way of addressing someone who has high levels of social privilege.
You’ll also notice in comments, especially on embedded websites like Weather.com, where people will reply to users by their full name. If there is only one Stephanie*   in the thread, some people will refer you unwillingly as “Stephanie Brickenelli*”. Again my theory of uppity and ultra classy socialization is in my opinion just wrong.
*using a random and fictitious name
Since Facebook went live first in Harvard and later to a few other Ivy League colleges (oh, I mean University), it would explain my logic about the uppity class of “full name”. Sure MySpace or Live Journal was a screenname based system, Facebook was trying to eliminate the screen name because allegedly you could be anyone behind a screenname.
Well Catfish has clearly debunked that myth, and the worst offense is people are fibbing behind the real-name sites like Facebook!
So in these real-name social networks, people may be posting things under their real given name, but the issue is how they over focus on the positive! Their lives under their real-name are so rosey, the truth kinda gets a little twisted. And sadly, some people get caught into the over positive, that it causes people to avoid contacting them  (and my own Facebook account was over negative.)
Unlike other people, I don’t fault Facebook. It isn’t the medium, it is the message. It is the people who post things under their legal identity and they hold no accountability; from the scandalous photos to just making their lives comparable to a Cambridge, Massachusetts or Cambridge England of a socially privileged class.
However, if Facebook should deserve such criticism, Facebook opened an offline world of uppity social class and virtualized it and made everyone both online and offline a socially entitled brat, and that’s the sad truth about the [social] world that revolves around Facebook.

Personal Story: Tiaras, Beauty Queens and Biaches

I watched the Miss America Pageant on television the other weekend, and the only reason why I did was to see Miss Montana, also known as Alexis Wineman, an 18 year old who has a form of autism, specifically PDD-NOS. Some people speculated she has a form of Asperger Syndrome, but AS is technically not part of the autism spectrum disorder as of this writing. Alexis has mentioned publicly that she suffers with social issues, and has constant meltdowns.

She did pretty well regardless, and of course what you see on camera, can be totally different off camera. That applies for everyone, not for someone whose autistic.

I have to say she’s a beautiful young lady given her autism and her struggles in her early life. There aren’t that many girls with autism and ones that look beautiful.

I digress.

Continue reading

OKCupid: “Love is Blind”

OK CUPID is wrong. Here’s why:

OkCupid is shutting off the image service of their website as they tout a new app “Crazy Blind Date”. They are making a stupid decision. We need to stop this logic that “love is blind”. If it was I wouldn’t have to go through my annual sexual harassment class or Limited Brands’ Victoria’s Secret unit making obscene profit margins. OKC needs to be called out on their campaign that love is blind. In fact we need to advocate the fact of accountability and transparency. Showing PDA in public in the effect that couple aren’t seeing anyone else is wrong. If OKC was a stock, the circuit breakers would blow up like crazy because of the heavy sell orders.

Update: After 6:40 pm Eastern Time, the site is back online with non pixalized profile pictures.

Catfish

Has anyone seen the TV series Catfish on MTV?
I channel surfed the other night can ran into that program
The show is like a documentary following people who met others online (i.e. a online relationship.) The host meets with the skeptical party member, and goes to search for the other individual, to see if the other end the person is a total fake. The host of the program will start off by looking the profile on the respective website whether its Facebook, MySpace, etc. and if there seems to be a fakeness on the profile, the producers start to look them up elsewheres.
This program meets with the crossroads of To Catch a Predator when they go to meet or ambush the person of interest. Some of these cases were the partner lied about their identity, their location, their looks, in some cases they were cheating with another person.
The last episode I seen had a guy meeting a girl online. This girl, named Melissa who appeared online, billed herself as a pretty blond “Barbie Girl” (in her words) with blond hair and blue eyes, as the skeptical partner found out she was a curvy, brunette with brown eyes and all the other attributes turned out to be opposite. Near the end of the program, the two try to come to terms.
In other episodes, its a teardripper because of the sudden reality that their online relationship was a fluke.
Has anyone else watched this program? I’m going to watch some of these OnDemand, if its on there. Its an interesting program.

Customer Relationship [Mis] Management

I’ve mentioned before Christmas how cyber entities like Amazon.com are eradicating “box stores” and the humans that work there like a Best Buy or a Barnes & Noble. Sites like Amazon exist because our society are a bunch of freeloaders, wanting things for cheap and these same bunch of brats have no idea what the value of a dollar is. I think that is easier said than done.
Amazon is “cheap” for a number of reasons. They have limited overhead. One is they have a few warehouses, and item coming out of those warehouses go right to the customer as opposed to a box store. Second, is they have limited customer services. Ebay has much better customer service, given how badly managed they have been lately.  Like in the earlier story, I’ve mentioned there is no toll free number, and the emails are “generic” but are manned by an agent sifting through thousands of emails. Customer Relationship Management or CRM is the computer app where these agents look at the email and decide how to solve it by cherry picking a few drill down options and add a sentence or two of a personal message then presses send back to the customer.
Amazon is anonymous in the Seattle region, one of the city’s largest employer.  A Seattle paper wrote a story last year about how all the other big companies in the city like Boeing, Microsoft and others giving money to local charities and reaching out, while Amazon’s employees are forced to be anonymous and work in buildings that are unmarked. The western part of the United States is nothing but mind boggling how there are so many adolescents who think they have the freedom to run a company but hold no accountability.
That same story, the newspaper tried to get in contact with Amazon.com’s public relations, and they got a response back. The response was probably done with their CRM app, because it looked so generic!
I’m not even done with this story!
On Christmas Eve, the eastern part of the US, their side business of providing cloud services for companies like Netflix went out. This was the fourth occurrence in less than a year. NetworkWorld, wrote a story last week comparing their “apology” emails dating to April of 2011 and how there was only a few words that differentiated all of their messages that appeared a generic  CRM reply.
Dealing with retailers that are CRM, even worse contacting via the web, in this case Amazon.com is sobering. You have to deal with rules and e-tailer’s policies and there is no way around it. It’s the childish “rules are rules.” With traditional retailers, they can bend around costs, returns or refunds based on human instinct.
But I live in a free country. The country wants do things for cheap to free, and unfortunately when we want things for free, we give up for other things, like fending for ourselves if we need customer assistance on a messed up order and another childish phrase “dealing with it” just like how they responded to the cloud outage on Christmas Eve.

Customer Relationships – A Dying Breed

I’m a brick and mortar shopper. Even with my hi (now becoming more low) tech life, I like to do both. Part of the online shopping is that I like think things that were once niche or someone that needed a IRS Tax ID in order to purchase things. With the Web and the online world, things that were difficult to get were much easier to do. I’m no defender of “consumerization” since most “consumers” are stupid, they are casual users like technology for an example, and most consumer stuff is mostly focused on style and not on the substance. I get  crazy when people go to Staples and buy a laptop that won’t survive in 6 months, because it has pink casing with heavy glossy paint. Speaking of Staples, their office supplies seem to be “user friendly” (focused on style and again not on the substance) to the point where I try to get some of my office supplies via a catalog-based/web supplier.
Another issue is the decline of brick and mortar due to places like Amazon (which I have been a seldom shopper, but I don’t have to time to sit down and navigate through their offerings) and eBay. The brick and mortar shops could had averted the disaster if the sales clerks would’ve learned to be more competitive.
Best Buy’s customer relations have gone down the drain as the years went by. Best Buy has seen CompUSA and Circuit City bit the dust in the last 4 years. And Best Buy has gone more arrogant and cocky, as the ex-CEO got let go earlier this year for violation of ethics (i.e. weaseling out of potential, but alleged sex harassment case.) You go to the local Best Buy and you see the sales people dumbness right out of your eyes. They could be trained on a specific product, but they now don’t do much training. Also simple mistakes can be very costly. For one example they ring up a big ticket item and forget to ring up a $30 SD card with a purchase with a $700 DSLR camera, and luckily this case didn’t set off the alarms.
Amazon.com was around when Best Buy and Barnes & Noble went on a binge building spree of building large footprint (albeit leasing) in the mid 2000s during the “big box” boom to later find out that Amazon’s pricing were making these stores “showrooms” where someone will touch and feel the product and then go online to find a cheaper price.
These kinds of stupidity is what is bringing down many of big box stores. However, on the flip side (defending) these box stores could do better. They need to shout out that sites like Amazon and other e-tailers do not have free standard shipping. Office supply people have had a nice process of free shipping of any number or cost of orders. Amazon and others require you to have have a minimum and even that some other retailers offer free shipping only during the holidays
Given how pricey gas is, at least you aren’t paying overhead for companies like UPS.
Some people call the Internet a free world and use my state’s motto “Live Free or Die”. Well in this case you also get the customer service you pay for. The e-tailer world is not customer friendly if you have a problem with your order. In fact there aren’t that many customer service to begin with. Amazon doesn’t have a WATS number easily available and if you email you get essentially a systemic response because they only have a finite amount of people dealing with customer service. The humans are essentially using big software packages known as Customer Relationship Management or CRM, but that middle word is actually contradictory! They get so many emails, and to speed up the process, they do actually read your message, but they click on a few checkboxes and you get a reply that appears to be automated.
So lets say you got screwed on a purchase, and you want your money back or get properly credited, in a the real world (save myself using that mouthful of a phrase) , you would deal with humans and it only takes a few seconds to page a manager and then have the manager say “yea sure” press a few buttons to override and wola you got service!
In the virtual world with ordering via the cyber reatilers, its mostly mainframes,  robots and other automated processes that does the ordering, the processing and even getting the package into the box! If you got screwed on a wrong order, or got billed improperly or what, you then have to essentially submit a ticket with a short message on the customer service webpage and you get a response back you get a name you can’t pronounce, they’re probably robotic in the real world, and in the message – dare I say they are very systemic, and chances are you won’t get much help if you got screwed – when they say its the rule, it is the rule and no overrides whatsoever.
There is a time and a place for both cyber and offline purchases. Both are good, and both can be bad but in order to have competition, the online world needs to learn to build up their customer service, and the offline world needs to take a refresher on customer service, and build up their knowledge of their products. The packet-based world doesn’t have the warmth an presence of the offline world. It will never happen.
Sadly, there are many people who cut corners (and for right reasons for some) and unfortunately there are more and more people that only grew up in the online world, and to them brick and mortars are for their grandparents.
It is a shame to see many of these larger than life buildings just become vacant. And in this fragile economy its even worse. And the irony is people that go to these places are ones who were considered as socially inexperienced – but its really the “normal” people that have gone onto the virtual route.

Families, Christmas & Relationships

Christmas time in recent years has been traditionally the most difficult (and depressing) year for me. I think a vast majority of people around the world whether they are” normal” or “different” could attest to my thoughts.
I don’t think as one gets older and the views of the holiday changes, it’s the fact I’ve seen my own family fell apart thought my childhood into my teenage years and into my adult life.  I believe part of this has to do with people being self-absorbed. I have a few family members who have ruined our relationships and just witnessing it has been painful. Thankfully I’ve closed that chapter over the last few Christmases.
My (maternal) aunt has been absent of my life since I was about 16, she’s a handful to deal with. She has been around my area on several occasions in the last year like it was no ones business, which in part that is a literal statement and a figurative one at the same time.  The family had basically broken up with her several years ago, and she had gotten married and had a child and had told us after the fact. She doesn’t live around here, but in an area hundreds and hundreds of miles away from where I live. She’ll contact my grandmother on a occasion and talk to her like nothing happened. No guilt or any sense thereof. I could even understand her or forgive if  she had any guilt thereof.  To end that story, she’s a textbook definition of someone who is “fake” and is chronically a jerk. It boggles my mind how can someone be so careless, but act so caring in the most lamest fashion. I won’t bring up additional “drama” since it is to do with my family in an intimate way, and I don’t need (literally the) entire world* to know.
*I’ve gotten more international followers than I have domestic on this blog!
Another family member that has been part of my relationship from childhood was a cousin from one side of my family tree.  She’s less than 5 years older than I am. She used to baby sit me. And she knew about my difficulties. (I was naive and thought my family didn’t know about my autism, I don’t know how much they knew at the time. I was that bad – at a young age of 18!)
She finished high school at the turn of the century and went to a university in Providence, and later was dating a boyfriend and later had a kid and gotten married. It really was she was  with a boyfriend, gotten pregnant, moved back to the area, and then gotten married, etc., etc. etc. Unfortunately, things went very fast, and that timeline all happened within one year.  Her later-to-be husband I wasn’t too fond of (and still I have difficulties with.) He is originally from the South, and I kinda don’t care for Southerners.
Meanwhile, my cousin has a severe case of undiagnosed ADHD, where she can’t sit still for one second (don’t try a New York Minute with her  ether!) Her ADHD-like demeanor just really puts her into a fog and a tunnelvision.
Unlike the aunt I was discussing about earlier, this cousin is the suburban-girl stereotype I have been very critical on the blogs I’ve published in the last couple of years. In high school, she was very popular, was in athletic clubs, being HS president, the valedictorian and all that crap that one experiences in high school. She was well liked. So much, that she added up her social circles in college.
Many.
A lot.
So much, Facebook wouldn’t need to be referenced about her social life, because I see it outside of the browser window!
Supposedly her “friend” count on Facebook is near 1,000, but I see her large social circle when I have been to family gatherings, and family should be stricken out because often when we went to her kids birthdays it was like we were the third-wheel.
I’ve been over the drinking age for over 4 years now, and my phone hasn’t rang yet about going out for a beer together with my mother, her and her husband.  Hasn’t happened yet. She’s been to more bridal showers (and now after marriage) baby showers  from the college age and high school friends than she has been with her family. And speaking about drinking, she was one of those party girls, though now  being thirty, she’s is supposedly slowing down, and the partying allegedly has slowed down too.
I was taught when I was in my late teens that most friends fade after various stages, and while you retain some friends in stages like high school or college, it was that some would continue, not like how my cousin has (again, Facebook or “friends” on Fb has nothing or little to do with this story, because the story explains itself in the real world!)
I’ve haven’t seen her in a long time, last time was around Christmas. She used to be a manager of  a major borderline-yuppie national bakery chain in my area before moving closer to home of opening a new shop about a year ago.
I might be bitter because there is some natural jealousy to her lavish lifestyle in her twenties, something I never had to begin with, because I was taught to grow up right after my 18th birthday (as perverted as it is.) And I haven’t used Facebook for a few years actively, and seeing this overrated lifestyle in the real world has hurt me even more. And this is my cousin – a cousin I was very close with as a kid! Someone who should had been aware of ones dysfunctions and using as a perspective in life! Yes I have changed since a preteen, but you get my point!
It hurts around this time of year, when such holiday is to be with the close people in your family, and some family members you think are close to you; is not close to them and the only solution is to just take them out of your life. And for someone like me, it’s the most painful thing to do, but you have to get on with your life. But it’s the only option that will be a logical solution.
I write these public stories to show how I am unfairly having a void in my brain called understanding relationships and how its not me – it’s the other people have redefined relationships or ruining the definition.  Sadly, its my own close family members that are redefining relationships.

Private Social Media Accounts & Destruction of Public Relationships

If you follow Wall Street or the business news, you probably heard a little scandalous post from Reed Hastings, a pompous ass C.E.O. from Netflix. Hastings used his private Facebook account to disclose financial information, that allegedly the public has a right to know.
His Facebook account (not a page mind you) is private. Allegedly the information he posted, is only visible to his friends. Again, this man is the C.E.O. of an American company that trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market, and a company that has to comply with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This is not a startup company, not a privately held business, and not something coming out of mums and dad’s basement. The man is posting data that would be expected from the latter and NOT the former. This man has a rap sheet of posting “material information” that could impact that NASDAQ traded stock, and using his blog on the Netflix website and in other venues that the S.E.C. prohibits at this time.

Sorry Reed, you can't have it both ways, keep the general public out of your postings from your PRIVATE Facebook account. Courtesy: Facebook

Sorry Reed, you can’t have it both ways, keep the general public out of your postings from your PRIVATE Facebook account. Courtesy: Facebook

I’m not going into a political issue, discussing rights and wrongs, what I will discuss is how public officials are using private accounts and using that as a backdoor to a growing world of Destruction of Public trust for a public entity (i.e. corruption.) Corruption is more dangerous to society in my opinion that anything else.
Definition:

 “dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery : the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places.”

dictionary.app from my Mac.

Key word in this issue is “dishonest”. Dishonest by using something such as a private Facebook account to discuss something of allegedly financial impact to a large company.
Ok, I don’t get this. Why in the hell is a C.E.O. is allowed to have a private Facebook account? If he wants to have something like that for his position, he should contact the PR department and issue a Facebook page controlled by the PR (or in this case the Investor Relations people), to make sure he is in compliant of all laws!  C.E.O.s do not have the time to Facebook. Sorry, it is what it is. I don’t care if its 2012 or 2050 when we will allegedly be using wearable computers, C.E.O.s need to be sitting down in an office with a Windows NT issued workstation/laptop and abide by Corporate IT policies and comply with many laws whether you like it or not.

And who in their left minds think its cool to literally befriending an executive elected by company shareholders? It is a lack of disrespect! If you work in the industry or work for Netflix this shows how shallow this social society has become. And all the Silicon Valley boys who should be in jail some way shape or form for being cool, have no opposition.
I’ve said before, I grew up against the Baby Boomer generation, and when I see those people and their Millenial offsprings and how disrespecful they are and how many “friends” they have – as someone who feels that he needs to be a little scared by the big boss for a value of respect is just an utter shame!

I really am ASHAMED for seeing how many people are so “autistic” and the really autistic individuals are your old fashioned, law abiding, respectful “normal”  citizens. I can’t believe I am saying that only 5 years ago it was unknown if MySpace was going to have legs or Facebook sustaining. Now there is all these social media all over the place enabling corrupted behavior!

If I was the Federal attorney, I’d throw him in the slammer. If he is doing PUBLIC business behind a PRIVATE Facebook account, that’s a violation of SEC laws in some form. We could appreciate having less bastards in the uber world called Silicon Valley. It is YOU that are destroying the social standards!

SHAME!

Thank God for Facebook

I really mean that in the title.
I can’t imagine what life was like if you suffered with social retardation and a world before social networking websites, or even the Web, or even those “online services” before those became ISPs ala AOL anyone?
I remember the simpler days in 1992 me being 5 years old living in my own little world. In 1992, Cable TV was at the height of their success, computers were still not in many homes, and the telephone was the primary medium to connect to people in long distances, and since AT&T was forced to break up, it was much easier to make long distance calls.
Again, I can’t imagine being socially retarded and being in his early twenties then. I would think there was more hopes back in 1992 than 2012 because there wasn’t sites like Facebook where you could easily look someone up to find many of the girls/guys one would like then to find your heart broken.
This post was something in the making, it was only a matter of time, and a person of interest to use as an example. This post will describe how using sites like Facebook to find some random person you had the hots for turns out to not be single. I’ve used this as a resource on a number of occasions.
In an earlier story back about a couple weeks ago, I went to a local FedEx/Kinkos/Whatever the name is of the day, and liked the gal that was helping me to do a large document project, that I felt was better done if I outsourced the project to them.
Well as you see in the full screen below, you’ll see the red circle of what I found out.  This is an example of how Social Networking destroys one’s hopes that there is a special someone out there. And of course, shes about 5 years older than I am (from when she finished high school – I redacted all the identifiable info) and it just shows that there are less and less single people near my age bracket. (unless I go younger, which I do not support such thing.)
a screengrab from a Facebook account of a girl that I had liked, and wrote about over a couple weeks ago
Social media just ruins the experience of a “crush” the only ability of a romantic feeling I have.