Tag Archives: Victoria’s Secret

Victoria’s Secret needs to be Outlawed for Corporate Prostitution!

Posted on by
Reply

Why in the hell is Victoria’s Secret still in existence?
They aren’t not even near the roots where they began in San Francisco.
If that, they are a global company, larger than life, and getting models who aren’t even from the States. Sure there’s a few like Lilly Aldridge, from LaLa land, and another American I can think of, but they gotta put the others up and front.
I am just sick and tired of their overzelious marketing that kinda makes me think that women are becoming sex objects. To me, that is sick. The PINK collection is also just so low class, I can’t find words.
If I was an AG* in a state that that could prosecute a company, I would. Victorias Secret is enabling a new world of human trafficking. Use underwear as a motive to have sexual relationships. The marketing is out of control. Why isn’t this company not fined by a state like Connecticut or New York?
*ok, call me a jerk, call me a bully, call me a slanderist (if that’s even a word), call me  a hateful person – I don’t give a shit!
This company is so degrading to society, AND MOSTLY to women! They are enabling women to be sluts! Is that offensive to say the goddamned truth? And yet this company gets away with psychological murder?
Please some AG, please find a fair and probable cause to take this company down to make society more respectful. Marketing sex objects to me is wrong and should be illegal.
Corporate prostitution is bad!

The $cam Known as Valentine’$ Day

Posted on by

I noticed right after Christmas, the retail shops started to move the displays of the Christmas goods, after some places had Christmas stuff right after Labor Day, and concurrently selling Christmas stuff along with the Halloween decor and candies.

So what was replaced?

Valentine’s Day.

Valentine’s Day is the worst marketing I find more obscene than Christmas. It’s not a holiday per se, but it is a marketing machine that should make the Catholics upset.
And part of that is just the idea what defines “romance” what defines “love”.

  • Is it candy?
  • Is it cards?
  • Is it just simple admiration?
  • Should I give cards out to my family members?
  • Is it to do with solely on sexual intercourse?
  • Is having crush love?
  • Do we define girlfriend/boyfriend relationships based on the click of the mouse on their Relationship Status on a social networking website?

What is it?

I don’t know.

I do know that in the recent years, Valentine’s Day has accelerated out of control, and the definition has of course been redefined to a non-standard definition.

I will throw some rocks at Victoria’s Secret, Limited Brands, their parent company should be reporting some obscenely high profits when that quarter closes, and Barry Diller’s Match.com (which now touts only 1 and 5 relationships start on the Net) will report another obscene growth (since after all it costs nearly $200 for a subscription all paid in full on a one time bill) and he will never spin off the property, even if the site is well independently financed.
In no means, am I defending any means of welfare, or equality – but as someone who has been unemployed or underemployed, and someone who grew up by a single parent living in a privileged town where he himself wasn’t privileged, it just makes it difficult to find someone that understands my situation.

I do know Love can be a scam, and unfortunately it isn’t illegal by Federal Law to sell goods relating to  love or romance, as per to any regulatory authorities like the F.T.C., S.E.C. or the F.B.I. except you can’t do prostitution.

Wait? Isn’t whoring products about love considered in some degree “prostitution”? Then how come Limited Brands or Victoria’s Secret not getting any Federal investigation? The messaging seems to be clear, they sell underwear just so someone can fuck another – that I find illegal?

I find it illegal that Victoria’s Secret uses modeling agencies (aka subcontracting) that employs models that aren’t even American. Where’s the Feds on that?

I digress

I do find it technically illegal to be legally sell anything to do with romance or love. If only were I a prosecutor, would I love to legally  destroy companies that have destroyed society.

Suck that Alessandra Ambrosio and Mrs. Tom Brady!

Again I digress.

I just hate romance and every freckin Valentine’s Day since like 2003, its just salt in my wounds. I love bitching about this at this time every year to shut up all the slutty defenders of such day.
*

Victoria’s Secret’s Redefinition of “Love”

Posted on by
Reply

This world is falling apart. Maybe the Mayans were wrong. But our morals, ethics and standards may be at the end. I’m talking about Victoria’s Secret. Since The Limited has owned this entity for over a decade, they have lowered the social standards for America. Outside of the states, maybe people admire them for the beauty, but here in America they have lowered the standards and have made sex the new norm just like kissing and hugging are – yes sex is now in the lowest common nominator for affection!
This ad campaign they use during the Christmas holidays makes me sick. Watch it on YouTube (sinee VS prohibits embeds)
Tell me that you love me!
Why?
Are you desperate?
Do you mean that you want me to “fuck” you or sincerely like to fuck you?
Are you implying that that you are trying to seduce me?
To be quite blunt, seduce me any other time of the year!

A Little Opinion on Victoria’s Secret

Posted on by
Reply

My goodness has Victoria’s Secret changed since I was young.
It used to be a San Francisco Operation or SFO – just like in the airport symbol! You know, they made the store more male friendly so they wouldn’t look crazy going into a lingerie store. The Vicrtoria in the name refers to the Left Coast’s “historic” housing of the Victorian type.
At some point, Limited Brands had bought out this humble operation. The models at the time were not foreign, and they were as American as you can get. A long time trivia the panelist on The Five on the Fox News Channel and the network’s legal analyst Kimberly Gufolyle, had done modeling gigs for the company in between being a law student in the University of California. (I can’t independently confirm of this, because such images would be very scarce, although there was confirmation last October on the same program about her gig back in her younger years.)  Nowendays, they get people like an Alessendrea Ambrosio beauty, then doesn’t have worry about for the rest of her life, because they pay these professional modeling agencies tons of cash. It wasn’t like that 20 years ago.
Beauty is overrated, and I want to discuss more about models at a later time,
But with that said, I got a real gripe against V.S.
As time went on, Limited had made Victoria’s Secret from the in the closet girly guy store to a total chick store, with a chic style. Or should I say slutty style or even skanky style? I’ve gotten more and more offended by how they use the style as an excuse to perform sexual acts with the subliminal messaging. My mother told me that V.S. was known for its reliable unmentionables, that the many times you would wash them over and over, they wouldn’t fall apart. Apparently since they went slutty, style acquired substance. It’s not surprising – its just like how everything else looks slutty and they break apart faster just like your computer or mobile device – they put so much focus on trying to give you a hard on and not how it will last forever -as love used to be defined as that.
I almost get a heart attack every time I go to the local mall or in public when I see PINK or LOVE IS PINK or anything with PINK and/or LOVE. This used to be the target line for the junior teens/ladies line, and it was heavily for the high school/college crowd. And these girls who wear these outfits are the ONES that should NOT BE LOVED! These ones don’t have a damn clue that you are supposed earn the love and not expect of it.
And again, these girls who dress so low to the social scale are the teasers. They love to show off their bodies, and once they feel like they are invaded, they just get all scared. It’s not my problem when you dress like a skank and can’t take the attention from the frisky guys.
Victoria’s Secret isn’t your mothers lingerie store anymore. Time has sure changed back 2 decades ago.