Tag Archives: Millenials

Busy bodies and busy Relationships

Posted on by
Reply

It’s rather interesting how people today are lacking relationship skills and not just social skills ether.  I blame this on airplanes, the Web and just the acceptation that its okay to screw someone and jump around jobs like its no ones business.
I’ve been using Match.com for nearly a couple of months and I do not like to engage a user that lives in New Hampshire but lived in Colorado for a decade or someone who lives in Boston who came from the Midwest and loves everything about Boston. Simply, I know there is more to New England than the City itself. I love Springfield, Hartford, Providence, Burlington, and Worcester! Isn’t that a surprise!
(Of course, I withheld Portland or Augusta because Maine sucks – I’ve  been there enough to say they are weirdos and hicks – that’s why I don’t visit there that often!)
I digress.
However, this kind of busy lifestyles doesn’t work well with someone who has difficulty transitioning from one place to another. I rarely moved in my lifetime, only about 3 or 4 miles of where I spent most of my first 23 years of my life. When I was 23, it was about 12 or so miles that I moved from the previous town I lived in.
The problem in three words? Lack of  Loyalty.
I grew up in New Hampshire, and traveled around the region, I wouldn’t trade this area for anywhere else. I have some, and I say some pride of where I live. Many of my peer groups does not have such level of some respect.
And this to me is a problem. The Millennial generation (i.e. the synthetically autistic types) are still acting like teenagers as some in this generation are 36 years old. For some reason we have allowed the vast majority of the normal functioning population to act like autistics while my group are expected to function as normal as possible. Which explains why marriage is much later and having children at a later age is happening. Dare I say having a child in their 30s can cause birth defects or even disabilities like autism. Even worse north of 40? These childish people are relying on unreliable technology to have children at a later age.
Again, I am probably making a low educated opinion on this, but craved stability since middle school. Even when I rarely moved physically, I went to several schools in almost every 2 years.  The staff in the schools had a very short shelflife too. Again, they were the twentysomethings figuring their lives out with the most mission critical job required of such lack of responsibilities. On top of the very young age, the other excuse was “they need to start somewhere”.

I feel sometimes I’ve worked in the local TV news business, when one’s job security (historically) was lot worse than other jobs like working in the public sector, the phone company, or corporate jobs, and if someone got randomly fired, their career in TV news was actually “cursed”.  The Special Education world worked much like a particular Boston news station, and to use such analogy is pretty pathetic. Because no individual should feel like their classroom is a newsroom of a revolving doors of producers (teachers) or director (executive management) while the child (student) is like the viewer witnessing dysfunctional news operation.

Though I feel that loyalty the lack thereof is a roadblock to future relationships for me. How can I get “locked into” a relationship if the girl wants to move to California or Houston or some other random place in 2 years?
I can’t live such life anymore. I can’t imagine anyone living like that.

Distrust in women

Posted on by
Reply

As this year approached, I came to a conclusion that maybe, just maybe its not meant to be for me to be in any form of romantic, sexual or other forms of close relationships. Maybe I’ll be wrong or maybe I am right, who knows.
What I do know is I have lost tremendous faith in women. I’m not going into deep, but it’s really sad how the state of affairs are with women and how they treat men. As I have grown up, I have never looked down at women at such level than ever before. There are a number of reasons why women should be made ashamed for, as it follows

  • Media – I can’t say that enough. The media is very brutal, coarse and just plain cruel. The problem is not the media or the message, is the girl who is watching it and has no editoral judgement whatsoever. Girls and probably every other younger and dumber population is so retarded that they can’t analyze or go into it with a skeptical mind.  They watch Sex and the City and insist that the message of the portrayal of Manhattanites is so true, when its really dramatized. Lacking editorial judgement is real problem, not just the media that’s out there.
  • I am not one who says “take the TV out of their room” like some talking head at 8:00pm Eastern would suggest, but at least ether monitor what your daughter watches or have a dialogue. Media is much more massive in the last 10 years not due to the Web, but social media really just accelerated the coarse content. You could attempt to get away of it, but when MySpace and Facebook came around, one couldn’t get away of an Abercrombie-like photo of soft-porn PDA. I might actually have that pic and I’ll attach it if I find it.
  • Fathers (or lack there of) – I can’t stress this even more. Whether or not the parents are divorced or not is not the problem. I believe its the father that goes dormant as soon as the girl goes into menarche and starts wearing training bras. Just like I have mentioned earlier, while the mothers (and fathers) instruct autistic boys, how to control their hormones when dealing with the opposite gender, girls appear to not be taught the same standards. It’s really bad that these girls apparently aren’t getting the love, the tough love or concern of their daughter, from their father.
  • Girls (young ladies) are really indecent more than ever before, and no it’s not that Facebook and a older mind is seeing things much differently, its because there is huge generation of young and dumb individuals who were raised by dumb Baby Boomers, and this kind of style was prelveant in the 1960s.
  • This same offspring includes a vast majority of narcissistic types who think that being a celebrity pays off.  Not so much if you are Jodi Arias, a woman in Arizona who was recently convicted of killing her boyfriend facing the death penalty. This woman is not only crazy, but pretty psychotic. The tax paying citizens of Arizona had been droned for more than 4 months of testimony factored in with the media sensationalizing the story (although it deserves some merit that Pretty Girls Kill.) She’s a hardcore camera whore too, within an hour after her verdict nearly a month ago, she got an interview of a local TV station, and also got camera time with ABC’s GMA, and so on. I can go on, but simply put I never heard anything about her father, I did hear she was abused when she was younger, but boy, this chick deserves the hell that she had caused with her family, the boyfriend’s family and the tax paying citizens of Arizona which will have to flip a bill on one of the most slowest murder trials in a few years, again it was so she could get all the attention she thought she deserved, not to just have a through trial.
  • Suburban types – Girls grow up at a fast pace in the suburbs. They start drinking in like eighth grade and their behavior goes well into her thirties. They want to act like mature women wearing mature outfits but they never take the responsibilities of a woman when it comes to any aftermath of such hard partying. Drinking clouds the world around you and you only see your drunken peer. These types of ultra rich, lack of responsible people that are often found in the outskirts of the metro area is another form of women I cannot trust. (BTW: not encouraging in “redistributing the wealth” ether – its just a responsibility issue of rich people.

As you can understand now, this is why I have a bias against women. I’ve never met a bitch I truly liked and all the good ladies are professionals to me, already married or taken. I really don’t understand why so many of these bitches can’t grow up and learn to not be such a snobby jackass.
In closing, I have zero respect for women.

Twentysomethings Moving Back in with their Parents

Posted on by
Reply

Fault of the Obummer Economy or Plain Ol’ *Loosers*?
Bloomberg News ran this little blurb recently about the rise of young adults moving back in with their parents.
I understand that people born before 1960 had this mentality that as soon as you finished college, you’d live on your own or live with roommates  and if you lived with your parents, you’d be shunned by your peers. However with this legitimate Great Recession, I can understand some of those numbers, some would be safe to say they are the “llooossser” types. Also, lets not forget that the numbers of people with autism disorders born from 1987 to 1992, are turning that magic number of 21, and as soon as they turn 21*, they are out of school and in many cases out of work because the work programs are owned by the school systems.
*Minimum IDEA regs for services end at 21. Only 10 of the 50 States (the Liberal ones like NY, Mass, California have it at 22 and states like Michigan, IDEA cutoff is 26 believe it or not!)
I do get sensitive because in this Bloomberg piece, they do show a bias towards men that are moving back in, and of course that’s offensive to my group because there are stereotypes that anyone with autism are those lost looking little boys or just a plain old socially stupid PDD types or just men acting like regular jerks while they have their Asperger label. I came from a filthy rich town and I was very scared of finding my significant other because of the stereotypes of society, its like who wants to date a guy whose on the lower class side and suffers with a brain disorder?
I don’t trust the MSM that much, and I know there is an anti male bias to many of their reports (don’t forget how they had put focus on the autism stories a few months ago and how they put emphasis of how the boys have higher rates than girls – there goes that stupid boy innuendo again!)

NEWS ALERT: Autism rates are now 1 in 88 children!

Posted on by
Reply

Where’s my breaking news bell?
No this should not be any news alert whatsoever. In fact its hideous. Its insane. It should be challenged. Or better yet, ASD should be renamed as the Autism Spectrum Disease as it has been refereed as an “epidemic.”
On Thursday, the Centers for Disease Control had formally announced that the cases for ASD is now in 1 and 88 children. Their answer is that there are better ways to diagnose children than back 20 years ago and there are better ways now to effectively tackle the problems.
Well we can say the same thing with the Millennial Generation. I bet 1 and 88 adults born after 1977 have a synthetic autism where they are non verbal, and their social skills are problematic where they drink and have excessive sex, degrade their elders, treat people like crap and communicate on assistive technologies (ATECH) like their iPhone, or Android or BlackBerry devices with an app called text messaging. They also use Facebook to socially network, but if you have true case of ASD, its often frowned upon indirectly. If they say something inappropriately, thats ok, but if you have a true case of ASD and you were raised to be accepted as a creep, than you would get blocked and people defriending you.
I am not bullshitting the real cases of ASD (where i still believe in the 1 in 150, not this BS coming from the Obama administration) What I am BSing, is the numbers. Just like in other industries where problems are created to create job security, i think in special education this is the same problem.
People will use man-made to describe something, but for this subject it would offend females, so I have to say that some of the autism numbers or cases may have been woman-made thanks to women (meaning someone with female reproductive parts) in leadership in the local special ed departments, the local agencies for post-21 (or older) adults, or executives in human services. And those same ones are of age that they are post-menopausal, and they have the empty-nest syndrome. So of course, that might have to do with the numbers being what it is…that can’t be a conspiracy theory, right?
Am I advocating a “cure” for autism? No. Do I believe there is a “cure”? No I do not at the moment? Do I believe the “inclusion” of special ed kids in the mainstream classrooms caused the normal students to become more “special” than their counterpart? Partially yes. Do I believe the same practice caused society to be closed minded to the ASD population? As perverted as it is – yes.
The other problem lies in between PhDs vs the Psychiatrists with an M.D. background and their clashes to combat the disorder (the PhD’s perspective) vs. the disease (the M.D.’s perspective.) The DSM 5 is supposed to come out this year, and it may get pushed back a few years later thanks to distraction disorders like “shyness” or a “broken heart” or whatever bullshit comes from the over-educated, rest of the world mindset and the anti-Christan types that are making up “labels” to rip off the insurance companies (and if Obamacare is legal, then we will be ripped off.)
Because there are so many distractions to the DSM, the politics of ASD are still up in the air, meanwhile people like yours truly has been defined by the disorder, and he cannot define himself.
They aren’t kidding when liberalism is a mental disorder. I would love to see that in the DSM, but thats way too politically incorrect to put that in there.